Its like being against slavery. You could say, what's that to anyone, if you're against slavery then dont own slaves but don't stop others. And yet it's reasonable to be against other people enslaving others.
Your comment suggests you think abortion is "obviously" ok and perhaps you'd agree that slavery is "obviously wrong and different". Perhaps because enslaved people are "obviously" humans with rights and fetuses are "obviously" not. I don't know of course but it seems like a reasonable guess.
But so long as the debate is about what people hold as obvious and naturally correct, all you get is more polarisation.
If you question whether or not a slave is a person, then I don't know what to tell you.
https://www.liveaction.org/news/steve-jobs-adoption-connecte...
It is the same argument used to justify any opinion without proof
[1] "Multiverse" vs. fine tuned universe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_universe
[2] "Choice" vs. responsibility: https://trendguardian.medium.com/free-will-a-rich-fairy-tale...
Our minds can justify anything
[3] "Interpreter" mind: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31737462
You offered an opinion without proof, which is that Apple wouldn't exist. This is why these "debates" are so unproductive. Both sides have unfalsifiable positions.