Ah well. I'm glad there is still a reasonably healthy selection at all for those of us who have the same criteria in terms of "LAN only capable/HA control/no subs".
Ah well. I'm glad there is still a reasonably healthy selection at all for those of us who have the same criteria in terms of "LAN only capable/HA control/no subs".
They also need next to no data transmission rate in a lot of cases. 3 or even 2 thin wires could easily handle it.
You could even reuse USB-C as the connector, and optionally actually use the USB lines for configuration, or use barrel jacks for a bit more power and easy DIYing.
If you limited it to just really simple stuff you could use very thin cheap wire, branching however you want because you only need 4800 baud or less, easy to hide, almost no cost.
I don't agree, and it's not really about the power (though there are plenty which either are or could be hungrier if the capability was there). Ethernet is very cheap, standard, and reliable. It's easy to run by people who aren't electricians. Ethernet benefits from vast economies of scale and market, you can get minimal Cat 5e for <$0.07/ft (7 cents per foot), and piles of connectors too for pennies. It will be easy to pull and handle plenty of abuse. You can get it riser or plenum rated. Connectors cover a full spectrum of usage and are straight forward to do fast and then test for correctness with a massive array of tools also spanning the price/performance spectrum. Are you for real in suggesting USB-C vs 8P8C?
I'm not suggesting at all using PoE exclusively, but it is disappointing it's as rare as it is in commercial products. There's plenty of devices I'd like to just put somewhere and not touch again for 10 years, which battery isn't ideal for. Security, more stuff broadcasting into limited spectrum, trouble shooting and so on also factors in. It's particularly galling for things which actually do need hardline power anyway, are security/safety related, or both. Wireless absolutely has its place but shouldn't be the only option, particularly when it's commonly so freaking bad (like devices which make things "easy" by demanding to use an app and pair with the network your phone is on rather then just letting you enter an SSID and passwords and then mysteriously won't work arrrrrghhhhhh).
It sure has its strong spots, but it's not a slam dunk for all options.
On the sensor side, there are a few very nice esp32 based boards. Have a look at the https://www.olimex.com/Products/IoT/ESP32/ESP32-POE-ISO/ and friends. These kind of things are fairly cheap and will handle most sensors really well. They're also perfectly supported by esphome.
I'm fiddling with a setup somewhat like what you describe at our countryside cottage. Star topology for literally everything into the technical room: 230v power, proper cat6 for the high speed data network, and cat5e for sensors.
I tried to keep the wiring super standard. All sensor cables get terminated centrally in a patch panel, ethernet style. On the sensor side, I break out the wires I want using simple couplers.
I don't do PoE up to the sensor. I haven't found cheap super compact PoE devices . That's not a problem though. With some multiplexing, an ESP32 can handle a surprising number of sensors both at the data and the power budget level. So I use a few PoE powered ESP32's in the central network rack, and I power my sensors through those.
Heck, I’m disappointed there’s no ceiling-mount APs with built-in Z-wave/Zigbee.
Z-wave's relay design makes hub placement less of an issue than with e.g. wifi, which is probably why you don't see much attention paid to mounting/appearance concerns. It doesn't much matter, so long as you have a device near the hub, then another device near that one, and so on.
I hadn’t considered that the mesh nature of home control devices has negated the need for central placement.
They have documented this here: https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000263008-UniFi-Sup...