So what's your alternative, throw your hands up and proclaim ethical reasoning to be impossible, nothing is true, everything is permitted, and it doesn't matter what you do?
All models are wrong but that doesn't make them useless.
All models are wrong but that doesn't make them useless.
My claim is that the trolley problem is useless. It asks people to make a guess about how they would behave, but that guess is predicated on a set of initial conditions that are impossible to fulfill (omniscience is a bitch to get in real life).
How does gathering all that incorrect data help you? What ethical reasoning are you trying to tease out here?
Here's one you might love - "if the earth is flat and you reach the edge, would you jump?"
Now lets just categorize everyones answer to the that question.... and: Hold the phone! The earth isn't flat? It doesn't matter? It turns out this question has basically no relevance to anything!
Is it fun? Sure. Is it useful? I have doubts.
If you are a professional trolley network controller then you have the judgement and the duty to operate/not operate the lever. I think that few people would question the ethics of a professional operator flipping the switch to save the most people.