> if you can stand the fact that it's Gawker
That's a tall order. How about I just take your word for it?
And how is that site still I existence?
That's a tall order. How about I just take your word for it?
And how is that site still I existence?
Since Weinstein was mentioned, I have to admit I read Gawker and therefore was not surprised when hearing the allegations against him in the broader media because Gawker had been writing about him for years. They made some big, obviously embarrassing decisions (especially Denton’s stance on outing people), but imo got it right much more often than they got things wrong.