Stop right there, because it currently is.
Where do we go from here, is the question?
Can't believe I have to spell this out, but am happy to — it's the individuals making it up who are benefitting...obviously the organization has not been benefiting/improving from good leadership for some time.
Perhaps we should model it after insurance companies. Those guys are great at ruining peoples lives on a whim. And no one has ever once complained about insurance paperwork (at least in your fantasy land this is true i bet).
Or maybe we should model it after agricultural giants. Monsanto would be a good model, they've never done anything to hurt millions of people nor have they ever converided up any evidence that they intentionally ignored the issues their products could cause.
Perhaps you're thinking more in the tech space - this is HN after all. Facebook could serve as inspiration - the idea that they would push propaganda and surveil you in ways that the government wouldn't even think of is just nonsense right?
To prevent leeching we could hire the best hedge fund managers like bernie madoff and the best financial architects out there - accenture (formerly arthur anderson).
Point being, structuring things like a corporation does exactly what? Sure accuse me of cherry-picking but I have backups and backup-backup examples for each one I've named.
So anyway - for your amazing idea, please tell me how:
* this company would make money?
* one share per person == one vote per person, so how does that change things?
* do you handle citizenship changes? A buyback?
* do you handle new people being born? Dilute my shares?
* does this reduce absurd policies from idiots at the top?
Given the relative difference in size and complexity of structure, there is a vast power imbalance between the state and the citizen. There needs to be much more accountability.
They always descend into some sort of plutocracy where you can buy politicians loyalty or a dictatorship.
for example: america - plutocracy, russia - dictatorship