... have somehow reached the conclusion that the vaccine which did them no harm whatsoever, and is responsible for their being likely to have a very mild case of the disease, was not safe or effective?
Why on earth have they reached that conclusion?
No, that's never going to happen, and never was going to happen. Even the FDA presenters to VRBPAC (Peter Marks? Can't remember exactly) admit it. That's even without spillover and spillback between humans, deer, cats, etc. This type of virus is absolutely not a candidate for eradication, even the most optimistic predictions from before the pandemic would have required the periodic stamping out of spillover related outbreaks across the world for the foreseeable future.
Astrazeneca was suspended in eighteen countries across three continents. Nordic countries pulled Moderna.
"no harm"? really?
That's why they are either limited or outright banned for certain populations.
Moderna remains banned in the Nordics for boys/men under 30. NHS does NOT give AZ boosters, only mRNA. NHS will not give AZ for those under 40, only mRNA.
Follow the science below:
[1] https://thl.fi/en/web/infectious-diseases-and-vaccinations/w...
[2] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavir...
What would you need them to do to increase trust?