That was the same argument anti 5g people used for 5g arrays, they suggested the normal operation is safe but they can be turned up or focused on targets using software.
The 5G crowd just didn't research fully. They are still right.
That's fascinating from a psyops/infowar perspective.
As they say, "where there's smoke there's fire".
I've never followed any of the 5G conspiracy tommyrot, but isn't it odd that in all likelihood they're quite literally correct, but for simply the wrong ends?
Were I to don my master-manipulators black Pilgrim hat and apply some extra-strength twisting wax to my comedy moustache... I'd be be just delighted to insert such "almost true" ideas amongst a bunch of credulous idiots in order to suppress belief in my actual plan.