Open Street map exists as a dataset to build alternatives on, and I've seen a few like Maps.me which are pretty decent. But it does require crowd sourcing.
UPD: yes, they do, and these seem to be much better tailored at local audience from the first glance.
Nice case of how open sourcing was useful.
But the problem with vendor locked services is that they tend to go down with the vendor. That's why we need a separation between the OS providers, device manufacturers and software providers.
Sure there is OSM, but apart from pure locations (which are community led afaik) I don't know of any good reliable service for navigation not reliant on Google.
Edit: Apart from Apple Maps as well. Just in case someone points out the major competitor.
Hopefully some real competitor emerges.
In the US, there will be the occasional problem where some local street detail is wrong, but things like inter-city routing work great. You can do it on device with several different apps, and there are several different providers selling route calculation as a service that use OpenStreetMap data.
- Organic Maps
- OsmAnd
- mapy.cz
Note: Google has clearly better car routing and shop listings.
But for cycling or hiking OSM is typically superior.
Wanna withdraw money from a Post Office? Be prepared to return back empty-handed because "Link down" or gov. employees watching cricket matches.
See
- Organic Maps
- OsmAnd
- mapy.cz
Note: Google has clearly better car routing and shop listings.
But for cycling or hiking OSM is typically superior.
And you can fix map if something is wrong.
What? What makes you think this is unacceptable in the US?
I think most Americans prefer to be independent and not have to ask someone, but it's not really that rare.
And many hikers care A LOT about hiking and their maps. Hiking and cycling data in OSM is extremely good, as result of many such people being interested in project - as mappers and as users of data, including software creation.