Comment by Silhouette | Hacker News Reader

Comment by Silhouette | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

> "Adjusting round corners for a button in photoshop is easier then[sic] adjusting border-radius in css"

Yes, I got to that, and gave up. Anyone who can write that seriously is clearly at best a beginner skill level in both Photoshop and modern CSS. Anyone who can advocate a waterfall model is, as you say, severely out of date in their understanding of effective development processes (or building the software for very specific types of project where it actually works, but real web development projects are unlikely to ever be among them). And in particular, anyone who advocates mocking everything up in detail in Photoshop before writing any HTML/CSS if you need to produce fluid/responsive designs is simply having a laugh.

Your point makes sense when talking about developing software, however the article is in reference to planning a restaurant website for a client.

Try implementing an agile strategy with a sushi restaurant owner, or for that matter an attorney, dermatologist, or chiropractor. That would be a laugh.

B2B web design services struggle with showing tangible deliverables, a waterfall approach is the best way to keep the client satisfied and scope within your spec.

Sorry, but I've never accepted that argument. No Photoshop mock-up is going to represent exactly what all of your client's visitors are going to see anyway. Are you really going to make multiple Photoshop mock-ups showing different responsive designs or how a fluid layout looks at different window sizes, and then two or three variations of each using different anti-aliasing settings to simulate how the text will appear on different OS/browser combinations?

Meanwhile, you can show your clients a static page using HTML+CSS just as easily as one using Photoshop, and they will see how it actually looks. And you can still change border radius in CSS more easily than the hassle of working on rounded corners in Photoshop, which still defeats the entire premise of that part of the article.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com