What's the point of this weirdly aggressive reply? I'm not familiar with Kubernetes and wanted to know what it accomplishes so I could consider using it on my setup over what I have now. Get ahold of yourself.
You might not like my phrasing, but asking you what you saw, what possibilities would arise to you is a general & sincere question & you being so mortally offended at being challenged doesn't feel fair either. It would have been interesting to see you either try to guess, or put in 3 minutes of looking around & state more clearly what was unapparent about how these might be related. I was hoping you'd work to carry a little water in the discussion, to help illuminate what your mindset was, after a little trying.
> Get ahold of yourself
This is weirdly aggressive.
What an embarrassing shit show over an innocent question you could've simply ignored if you didn't feel like answering.
In my toaster analogy, when asked “what did you accomplish with the toaster?” they responded with (I’m paraphrasing here) “A better toasting experience for the PiBox team because of our existing toasting skillset” more or less.
It was a response that was easily distilled into a single sentence and moved past. Somehow they conveyed that without calling people “haters” or “problems” and I genuinely think that is because that poster had a good grasp of Kubernetes and its use cases.
I’ve done some searching and there are plenty of friendly and informed people on Twitter that are able to answer questions about the pros and cons of Kubernetes if you search #k8s and #kubernetes. I have learned not to ask rektide any sort of question for obvious reasons.