I believe the first EV might even predate the first ICE vehicle.
Reference: https://www.energy.gov/timeline/timeline-history-electric-ca....
https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-advice/who-invented-the-fir....
I believe the first EV might even predate the first ICE vehicle.
Reference: https://www.energy.gov/timeline/timeline-history-electric-ca....
https://www.carsguide.com.au/car-advice/who-invented-the-fir....
It sure is. Given a year in my garage, I bet I can make a more useful, power-converting device from scratch using internal combustion tech than using electronics.
>I believe the first EV might even predate the first ICE vehicle.
I also believe that is true. What's old is new again - time to get rid of those "dinosuar tech" ICEs and move on to...the even older EV?
Somehow electric delivery trucks are the new hotness, yet here in the UK, (lead-acid powered) milk floats are also a symbol of a byegone age.
Even now, EVs barely compete on practically any metric with ICE cars (except tailpipe emissions) - in my opinion, the main drivers of market demand for EVs is marketing for the new shiny, and government regulation (at least here in the EU/UK. It will be illegal to manufacture an ICE, quite soon).
Not in a format that is useful for EVs, there hasn't. Only recent developments in semiconductors have made it viable to design a motor controller that is very efficient across a broad range of torques and speeds, and is also lightweight and cheap enough for use in a small passengar vehicle.
>example hybrid electric trains, elevators, water pumps.
Those examples of controllers have almost nothing in common with modern EV controllers.
> Not sure what metrics you are looking at but EVs cost less per mile to operate, accelerate faster, are quieter, and have lower maintenance.
Let's have a look at those.
I am not convinced that the "cost per mile to operate" has been fully worked out over the full lifetime and ownership of an EV - we have yet to see how the overall economics of EV ownership will work out as they filter down the 2nd hand market chain.
We will also see how the cost of maintentance works out - EVs are not currently known for being reliable.
https://www.forbes.com/wheels/news/ev-reliability-varied-as-...
Accelerating quicker - well, that's fine, if you want to burn through battery, and mess around at the lights. It's also not too hard to find or modify a car to make it have more acceleration.
That just leaves quieter - which is an undeniable benefit, if only it were safe for multi-ton hunks of mobile metal to be silent. As it is, all the EVs I've seen have speaker-generated tones at low speeds.
The ease with which you can make oil-based fuels convert chemical energy into mecahnical motion, is the reason that EV development largely stopped until quite recently. Efficient EVs are the pinnacle of materials and electronics engineering.
15-20 years from now, they'll likely look more like the pinnacle of engineering, but they are actually pretty crude right now.
The efficiencies of the various powertrain components are very high (eg, charging efficiency and motor controller efficiency). I really don't see how they can be improved by very much.
The main area of improvement is the battery.
>they are actually pretty crude right now
Interesting. I am assured that they are the latest and greatest in motorised transport!
> Interesting. I am assured that they are the latest and greatest in motorised transport!
These two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
Hopefully by then, we'll have solved the problem of how to sustainably fuel both the manufacturing process and the fuelling of EVs.
Bear in mind that no-one cares about things like iPhone integration, reversing cameras, lane assist, or any of the other pointless crap that overcomplicates modern vehicles.