> To reverse your logic, affluent people should never commit crimes but yet sone do too. People make choices.
I'm not arguing that people make choices. Also, we are talking about the rate of criminal activity, not absolutes. Nothing in my argument says affluent people never commit crime, that is a straw man.
> Poor people aren’t as stupid as you think. Most don’t turn to crime.
I don't know how to be any clearer that I am talking about the _rate_ of criminal activity.
> I think this was once called the soft bigotry of low expectations. You are a bigot by your logic. Looking down on poor people is offensive.
I appreciate the ad hominem, but the one thing you won't answer is why then do poorer communities commit more crime on average? It seems pretty clear that less opportunity/resources makes it _more likely_ to turn to crime.
How do you explain the difference in rates if it's just choice?