For every proposed crypto use case, there already exists a better solution that does not use crypto currency technology.
And yes, I am aware that there exist cryptocurrencies that attempt (with varying degrees of success) to prevent the kind of analysis that would make this sort of enforcement possible.
Countries on the up-and-up are welcome to use Wise. [1] The ones that aren't are broadly cut off from the global financial networks for very good reasons. Either way, if you disagree with those reasons you're free to lobby for changes - but the ability to exclude them is overwhelmingly a good thing.
I mean look, it's not really even good for that. You have a public ledger of all your illegal transactions that you then share directly with law enforcement for them to feed into their automatic crime detection engines. Why bother with pro forma warrants? Just email your transactions directly to the FBI and have them make sure you didn't do anything wrong, I always say.
Dr Nicholas Weaver from UC Berkeley referred to such transactions as prosecution futures. I agree. After all, you're not even defending against current deanonymization tooling, you're defending against all future such tooling. Pepperidge Farm remembers Tornado Cash.
[edit] If I were in an authoritarian state capable of oppressing me, the last thing I'd do is use Bitcoin lol.