Meanwhile, solar output can go from 100% to 10% in three seconds. How is this not a problem?
Meanwhile, solar output can go from 100% to 10% in three seconds. How is this not a problem?
https://www.pjm.com/~/media/committees-groups/task-forces/rm...
An energy storage regulating resource, such as a battery or flywheel, cannot burn fuels to produce electricity, but instead charge and discharge energy from the bulk electric system itself through a power inverter. Energy storage devices can match a desired output within 200 milliseconds of receiving the regulating signal; therefore these resources do not need to model any dynamics, ramp limitations, or dead-bands.
Australia is also using batteries in a similar way:
"South Australian Battery Responded in Just 140 Milliseconds After A Coal-Fired Power Plant Failed"
https://www.sciencealert.com/elon-musk-s-south-australian-ba...
It's an area that's ripe for some software innovation, if they can actually break through the legacy management club that currently runs the grid.
While your example is solar at 100% exactly meeting demand, and then dropping to 10% in 3 seconds, and the fix for that is: overprovision (and some other stuff).
They do need to have decent predictions of demand and supply, like this graph that shows the 1-hour ahead and 24-hour ahead predictions:
https://www.caiso.com/TodaysOutlook/Pages/default.aspx
To get the whole grid working together, but we already have that, and renewables and batteries help in various ways.
Also, medium term storage is a very, very young industry. Things like redox batteries, flow batteries, molten salt, compressed air, and many others are on the horizon. The better these work the more gas peakers are solely used as backup.