Aside from the almost comically aggressive tone you've taken here, all you've brought to the table is a link to an image that claims to be of some value in comparing before/after grounding.

Said image has a weird and rather unprofessional font, no point of reference to any scientific data to back it up, and appears to be hosted on a storefront intended to sell you grounded running shoes.

Not sure that's how science works.

Is there a source for that image which confirms what you say it shows and from a legitimate experiment?

This whole concept is new to me so I don't have a dog in this race, but sharing a single out of context image rather than the research it (hopefully) came from doesn't do much to prove your claims.

I mean, taking your image at face value, sure. But I don't know if it is fraudulent, I don't know if it was properly controlled, I don't know anything at all about the procedure.

Remember those pictures of water crystals that had been subjected to emotions and formed differently?

Yeah my expectations for this comment thread were low, but it's funny to see people with literally zero background in biology skim a paper and suddenly become experts in physiology and experimental design