But is it a crime to possess an algorithm that can generate CP? You don't possess the images, it just generates them.
If it is a crime then it means any model which can generate CP under any circumstances will be illegal.
If it is a crime then it means any model which can generate CP under any circumstances will be illegal.
Don't count on the legal system to go "haha you got me touché" on this.
Apple has AI software the searches for photos given a text query (Siri feature I guess).
Searching for “baby” produces breast-centric photos of my naked wife posing in a sexy manner.
I mean I get the “breast/baby” connection - not rocket science. But I’d appeciate it if SFW queries didn’t product NSFW results.
This has already been the case for quite some time. AI doesn't really add anything new to that part of the equation.
No you don't, it just generated it and display it to the screen, it doesn't save it anywhere, you at no point posses it. Only solution is that everyone who posses a model capable of generating CP is seen as having CP.
"It's not my pot, officer! I was just holding it for someone!"
If you accidentally generate something inappropriate once with a poorly chosen prompt or an algorithm glitch, and it lives for a few seconds in your RAM before you close it, sure.
If a jury sees your generation history with a bunch of clearly "gimme that CSAM" queries, I wouldn't anticipate an acquittal.