It will never not be inflammatory, because there is always incentive not to follow the self-sacrifice position. What happens when groups, nations etc simply decline to weaken themselves by using less energy? Those who pursue energy use and power will dominate those who do not. Now, if there's a collective of those who wont accept that position because of existential views on the matter, then what? How does it not inevitably escalate into inflammatory and polarizing rhetoric and action? Follow the logic to it's conclusions..