> The sexuality and race is kind of irrelevant to the point

FWIW, adding sexuality and race was intentional. Why? Because of the briefs by the justices associate with the Supreme Court's decision on Roe v Wade. Specifically because the same privacy protections which protected RvW also protected gay and interracial marriages.

And that privacy protection was explicitly and intentionally nullified, as called out by Justice Clarence Thomas.

So, in the immediate term, one's sexuality and race is explicitly at risk.