I suspect marketing it as a decentralized computer that "doesn't have a cryptocurrency" makes it not a good fit for /r/cryptocurrency (probably a better fit for /r/cryptotechnology), though I think a shadow-ban is pretty excessive as a response

And to the point about it "not having a cryptocurrency" I didn't get a response on my last comment on Kindelia (copied below), but I think saying it "doesn't have a currency" is misleading, to be generous:

    This is interesting. It's "not a cryptocurrency" in the sense that the network doesn't have an official token for paying transaction fees. My understanding is that users would still pay fees to make transactions, they can just pay those fees however they want (assuming other tokens of value are supported on the network).
    There is still a cryptocurrency that produced for a block reward, used to incentivize proof of work consensus (it's not clear to me why proof of stake wouldn't be possible since there is a limited supply of this reward token), so it seems dishonest to claim Kindelia is a p2p computer that "isn't a cryptocurrency"