How do they figure a review someone posts on the internet is under copyright by the party being reviewed? That point baffles me, and I'm used to copyright making no sense.
"If you write a review of our services, the copyright on said review will be immediately assigned to us."
As the patient's lawyer notes, there's a good chance that fair use and unconscionability (two different doctrines) would render such a term unenforceable.
Again, this is just speculation based on a hint in the article.
My employer would effectively have to go to court against the dentist to see who owns the words I type, right?