> to face the consequences of admitting the side effects publicly.
From a quick google, such side effects have been widely reported since early last year, what exactly is "not being admitted"?
From a quick google, such side effects have been widely reported since early last year, what exactly is "not being admitted"?
Basically, admitting the public recommendation of getting a shot wasn't adequate to a certain public, do a grown up post-mortem of that recommendation, and compensate the victims.
Since effective means: you need this again every 3 months, and it won’t affect whether you contract or receive the illness, one can wonder objectively what it means to be safe.
There was never a "consult your doctor" or anything.
Any defense of how the media handled the vaccine is an example of malice through wilful ignorance.
You know it is bad when people have to sign comments with "-fully vaxxed btw"
Not remembering is to be expected, especially during the phases where there was a few new things about COVID every week (and people quite reasonably were kind of overwhelmed with news - keeping up with everything COVID was hard if you even tried). But that doesn't mean it wasn't reported or that information isn't available if you want to look it up.
And that's not even touching the topic of people just don't liking what was reported, which you'll also find across the entire spectrum. And everyone of course wants their current pet cause to be the thing dominating all the headlines.