While the points about facial recognition misidentifying black people are true, I'd rather it rely only on the civil rights issues associated with it working and not tie it to misidentifying minorities. That's a situation where in 5 years "it works on black people now, kay" is the argument to overturn the law.
I’m trying to to understand your point but I’m struggling to understand whether you understand your point.
You're arguing that the tech will always be discriminatory and the original comment is suggesting a method that would also work positively for what you are arguing.
Further, if you want people to get on board, you need to include everyone. When you make it about a specific characteristic of person, you lose support.
That is, if a reasonable number of humans couldn’t do it, the government can’t do it with computers against its population.
Federal payroll is something else that would probably take an unreasonable number of people to manage manually.
Or the census, which was an early adopter of computers (give or take your definition of a computer), because not doing so was taking almost the full 10 years between censuses.
https://www.census.gov/history/www/innovations/technology/ta...
Automating it just makes everyone unknowing victims to the tax corruption congress persists in.
I agree USA taxes are ridiculously over complicated and there's tons of tax corruption
Anything more is just congress trying to create retirement plans for themselves via lobbyist and special interests.
the spacing guild handles ships, they do train their minds, but not in the same way as mentats. They use spice melange's prescient powers to navigate more than maths.
I'm not concerned about facial ID getting my face wrong, as in a human couldn't be hired to do the same, I'm concerned about it costing fractions of a penny and the government doing it everywhere all the time.
There should be quantitative restrictions on minor rights violations that become major rights violations, even if they're sufficiently minor to be reasonable when done once by a human being in a way that costs the government 10,000 times more than having it done by a computer.
In other words, computers interpreting things in ways that counterfeit humans or computers generating things that counterfeit humans needs to be banned for government use.
I’m not talking about banning the steam shovel but systems where it becomes difficult to determine whether or not a human did it.