Honestly surprised by how much support this is getting, despite the devs' absurd views on open source[1]. Why anyone would choose this instead of Logseq is beyond me.
[1]: https://forum.obsidian.md/t/open-sourcing-of-obsidian/1515/2...
[1]: https://forum.obsidian.md/t/open-sourcing-of-obsidian/1515/2...
Maybe some of it is true for logseq, but finding articles, tutorials, guidelines and examples for obsidian certainly contributes to it's success.
Looking through that link, though, I don't see anything too absurd. It's a closed-source app, which isn't ideal but is common enough. It looks like they have a Github repo that explicitly does not have the core source code but hosts some secondary files, and that's spelled out in the first couple lines of the readme.
Seems fine to me, overall. Maybe there's something objectionable I missed in there?