How does that matter? It's not whether someone get stigmatized or not, it's whether they want to share explicit pictures or not. Even in a world without stigma, people could reasonably want pictures of them to stay private, and the choice should be theirs.
I interpreted the post you replied to be directed towards the part about extortion, and not contrary to what you are writing. I agree with both.
We should always have the ability to consent to naked photos of ourselves being available. I'm about as sex positive as it gets - it's not about puritanism, it's about consent.
The nudity is the least-relevant part of the story. The target could’ve been the victims’ private love letters or recordings of singing practice and the violation would’ve been the same.
We shouldn't be such a puritanical society that stigmatizes sex. We also shouldn't be a society that denies people their right to privacy. Both of these unrelated statements are true.
I don't want my clothed photos leaked either. I'm an ugly MF. It's not your business to decide which of my photos are leaked.
Dude, did you really say that? Where's the border?