> her work (copyrighted by the clients she works for)
There you go.
There you go.
Copyright exists to incentivize authors, artists, scientists, etc. to create original works by providing a temporary monopoly.
If an artist works with a client, the legal stipulations are going to be different for each commissioned work, generally.
Depending on the client, they may be better able to protect an artists work than the artist themselves, and with credit...
What a joke. That "temporary" monopoly lasts centuries and gets extended whenever some rich company's imaginary property is about to enter the public domain. Copyright duration is functionally infinite, you will be long dead before your culture is returned to you.
Either copyright remains unenforceable or computing as we know it today will be destroyed. There is no middle ground and I know which side I'm on. Computers are among the greatest inventions of humanity, they are too precious to be jeopardized because of such concerns as invalidated business models.