Hacker News Reader

Comment by robotnikman | Hacker News Reader

My theory is people are seeing the 'winners' post their gains on social media (like reddit /r/wallstreetbets) and so they try and go in and see if they can do the same thing. A lot of these people are in experienced and may not know what they are doing, with many losing money in the process

View on HN

/r/wallstreetbets was a weird one because there were so many 'winners.' I think on a smaller scale there's a survivorship bias too. In that sense, it's like deciding to play Russian roulette with a full clip because you saw the gun misfire for someone else.

There's been just as much, if not more, 'loss porn' on that subreddit. I think people just upvote the extremes. The middle of the bell curve is uninteresting: "Take it to /r/investing" as they say.

> I think people just upvote the extremes.

They do. There is no doubt there are a lot more "bagholders" than winners. People most likely upvote the winners hoping "I wish that was me" and keep chasing those mythical wins that seem to happen to everybody else except themselves (mostly). Therefore creating even more losses for themselves, etc.

Vicious cycle of hopium/FOMO.

A decent amount of WSB posts used to be "got rect" also, whenever the market moved the other way.

WSB also has a culture of essentially celebrating big losses. There's no shortage of examples of people losing their entire investments. It's a weird culture.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com