No, that's why they said it is the "right of the militia to keep and bear arms."
If they wanted it to apply to people, unconnected to the militia they would have said "the right of the People to keep and bear arms."
Wait...
If they wanted it to apply to people, unconnected to the militia they would have said "the right of the People to keep and bear arms."
Wait...
> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.