ZBM took another approach. It provides a small initramfs image that are built on the host machine via standard method such as dracut or mkinitcpio. This image provides an interface for decrypting/mounting ZFS filesystems using the very same ZFS kernel module and tools installed on the host. After the filesystem is mounted, it then kexec'd into the host kernel.
This also means ZBM doesn't completely replaced GRUB2 or syslinux. Instead, it rely on those intermediate bootloader (including EFI bootloader such as rEFId/gummiboot) to load ZBM itself. (Though ZBM itself only has built-in hooks for syslinux and gummiboot).
Being an initramfs give an extra benefit of providing interesting mechanism during boot e.g. providing a SSH server for entering an encryption key on a headless server[2], ability to discover, managing/booting from ZFS snapshots, etc.
(No affiliate; just a very happy user.)
[1]: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58555
[2]: https://github.com/zbm-dev/zfsbootmenu/wiki/Remote-Access-to...
1. ZBM prompt for encryption passphrase, decrypts the filesystem, locate kernel/initramfs on ZFS datasets, then display boot menu
2. ZBM kexec into the kernel on the filesystem using the chosen kernel/initramfs while appending root=zfs:... to the kernel parameter
3. The target kernel decrypts the filesystem[^] and mounts the root ZFS again and boot into final system
[^]: In this case, ZBM requires the encryption key to be placed in the target initramfs (not ZBM's) for the target kernel to load (dataset need to be decrypted again since kernel state is disregarded). This initramfs is located inside the encrypted filesystem itself, only accessible after initial decryption/mount by ZBM in step 1, so the only way to obtain this key is to already have access to encrypted filesystem in the first place.
If a pool is switched to read-write so that the default kernel can be set, a snapshot cloned to a new BE, etc, we check for that and then export the pool just before kexec.
Once kexec is done, your BEs kernel and initramfs essentially start fresh and actas if it's a fresh boot.
Anyway, since when has Linux been adverse to choice? Multiple different init daemons, window managers, desktop environments, cron daemons, MTAs, scripting languages, shells, etc. even the way you set up a networking interface can differ wildly.
Don't like choice? Go back to Mac, spare us your hot takes.