the point is exactly that: if you have to rely on very complex setups to keep the data fresh, it means that the data is not safe.
can you imagine an hard disk surviving from the ancient Egypt to us?
Another question I wonder about: How hard is noticing the failures?
Digital data requires some maintenance, but with cloud services that's offloaded to service providers. I haven't logged in into Glacier or the related AWS account in years, and yet it still backups my hdd regularly. Now, if a comet strikes the Earth and destroys all the civilization, yes, paper books will be a lot more useful than HDDs or dead cloud servers, but in more realistic scenarios data copies give you more flexibility. Just look at Ukraine, they moved all their official digital archives out of the country at the very beginning of the war. You couldn't ever pull it off with paper archives, it would take months and cost a fortune.