I rarely editorialize titles. In this case I felt that NASA was intentionally "burying the lede" so I substituted with a clear headline so HN readers would know what it's actually about.
I hesitate to point this out for fear of opening a loophole for abuses, but it really is a consistent pattern with press releases.
The other option, of course, is to find a good third-party article reporting on the same news. Whatever is in an organization's interest to obfuscate, is in a good reporter's interest to uncover, and if the story is important or popular, such an article probably exists somewhere.
* https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
> The other option, of course, is to find a good third-party article reporting on the same news. Whatever it's in an organization's interest to obfuscate, it's in a good reporter's interest to uncover, and if the story is important or popular, such an article probably exists somewhere.
The problem I think that there's (as of posting) no third-party articles about this from reasonably-credible writers.