On one hand I love this, but most of these sites are terrible and would have benefited from changes that would push it above 10kb.
Small sizes at extreme cost to UX is not worth it.
Small sizes at extreme cost to UX is not worth it.
Can you point to a specific problem?
Not wishing to disagree with the rest of your comment, but I expect many company logos can fit within the limit and look good when represented in compressed SVG (.svgz). Those can also be inlined on a home page to reduce initial view latency.
Were you unable to find the information you wanted?
Was the site confusing?
Or it was just aesthetically unpleasant?
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
In the pic the text is slightly cut off, looks like i zoomed a few pixels by accident. Still, a touch of padding would improve it imo :)
It's not just a matter of aesthetic, it's a matter of visual parsing.