Said outlaw software would be considered utterly radioactive by any corporation. It wouldn't get legs, especially when there are so many free alternatives that are unburdened by their illegal provenance.
That's okay. Free/open source software in general is still considered to be utterly radioactive but there's enough developers out there willing to work with and on it that it isn't a problem. There's no reason why we should let corporations direct what we use and work on all the time ;)
> Free/open source software in general is still considered to be utterly radioactive
On what planet exactly do you live?
The one where less than 99% of software is free/open source and where proprietary software is still considered a viable option unfortunately.
I thought you said you came from one where free software is radioactive.