Or, it's investing money in people with high expected ROI, such as, able-bodied adults. For it is the duty of a good shepherd to shear his sheep, not to skin them, right? (paraphrasing Tiberius)

You're moving the goalposts. Your complaint was about healthy, able-bodied adults who don't want to work.

Btw, not that it matters, but I'm against student loan forgiveness.

I would try carrying that though to its logical conclusion. Healthy people who don't want to work (aka don't have value, as work == value) shouldn't be given money. Money is needed to survive. Therefore it is okay if the person does not survive? Or rephrased as, if you don't work, you should not live?

I hope that's not really how you feel, but it seems like the clear logical conclusion to that kind of thinking.

>We need to do this less, not more.

Why? So you don't feel like a rube for working? Why don't you stop working, if that's the case, and cash in on this sweet sweet deal you allege these "healthy able-bodied adults" get?