And since he is narcist, he wants to be in the news all the time.
However negative news sell more. And somehow he made more enemies than Trump: Trump will not be booed in Oklahoma but Elon will be booed both in Oklahoma and San Franscisco.
I'm also curious why Elon Musk would be "booed" in Oklahoma (where I'm from, by the way). Is it because of his industrial achievements, or his libertarian and free speech leanings, or because he hails from South Africa, or...?
A lot of people who make movies on TikTok are just trying to get noticed and maybe land some job. Not narcissist at all: just trying to survive.
Trump is a rent seeker celebrity. Elon is one of the most productive humans.
They are radically different but both break people's brains because they are supposed to be pro-establishment refined elites. Instead they are uncouth and align more with the working poors and dissidents. That's the biggest sin and it's what drives TDS and EDS respectively.
That's an impossible to prove statement. And it reeks of fanboysim all over. It makes your entire argument look very biased as well.
Who would you say is the most productive?
It would have happened just like that, only the person doing the signing off (because that's what CEO do, they sign off stuff built by others) on those projects would have been called say "Mlon Eusk" a Swedish entrepreneur who moved to California, and right now you'd be worshipping him instead.
It's the same for everything, if Albert Einstein didn't come up with relativity it would have been Elbert Ainstain .
It's really bizzarre how any knowledge of statistics goes out of the window when disucussing people, celebrities and historical figures.
I guess it's a protection mechanism of the human brain so each and everyone of us can still believe that everyone could be a Powerball winner as long as they work hard enough or want it bad enough, whereas in reality it's just the luck of the draw, only the draw is only visible by people who manage to override that protection mechanism in their brain and look at reality as it is.
Einstein could have just done his 9-5 at the patent office. Elon could be hanging out on a yacht.
https://www.straightdope.com/21343699/was-einstein-a-plagiar...
As far as building a rocket company goes, yes, SpaceX has certainly achieved much, not least with reusable rockets. But again, Musk is hardly the only one in that space. Richard Branson has been at it since 2004, for instance, and at this point it's very trendy. Even Steve Wozniak started one.
If purely net worth, Musk isn't the 'most productive' because he simply isn't the richest person in the world, and has been loosing billions in months. But I presume you have a different 'productivity' in mind than just worth.
If it's purely numbers of products, someone from the Tata family is probably producing way more cars, rockets and social media platforms. Or else someone in Ali group. Or someone at Aramco, idk. Tesla sells way, way, way fewer (electrical) vehicles than most other large car manufacturers indivually do.
If it's relatively to where they started, Musk comes from a (very) wealthy South African family. He certainly increased his wealth incredibly, but I'm certain you'll find a Nigerian, Bangladeshi or even European person who, relatively, increased their wealth much more. Simply by being born with a debt, or nothing, and becoming reasonably rich, will make such a KPI higher.
I need to take a break from this website.
Not a fan of Musk myself, but yeah, he actually seems to be an extremely productive person. Whether this productivity is applied in the right place is another discussion.