Hacker News Reader

link? is literally the first line and the first link in the post above

> Worth remembering this is public information: https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=a835af

They said:

> If you own a home, your address may also be publicly available via county records.

You responded:

> ...is perhaps the hundred and fiftieth time I have read this (or a similar variant) nonsense of false analogy, already debunked explained and reexplained in hundreds of variants

Someone asked for a link to any of those comments:

> Would it hurt to link then?

And you reference the start of this thread, which is the thing being questioned. Your comments in this thread have been uncritical.

Anyway, I want to get it back on track if you're willing:

> I'm actually interested in hearing the counter argument.

There is no counter argument. This person was assigned their opinions by their chosen Internet tribe and has nothing to offer but feigned incredulity that anyone could possibly think differently than they do. 100% bluster, 0% substance.

Reading through this thread, it's hard to disagree with your conclusion. I still believe these comments are made in good faith (read: these things are actually believed) and that's why I point out the lack of a coherent argument. I'd at least like to extend an olive branch for a more productive discussion.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com