The statement is "[4chan] is linked to massacres". This is simply a statement of fact, and it doesn't mean NYT isn't.
(I'll be the first to call the NYT a rag, as a leftist, but it's factually correct to say 4chan is linked with massacres.)
(I'll be the first to call the NYT a rag, as a leftist, but it's factually correct to say 4chan is linked with massacres.)
E.g., NYT shouldn't level this criticism because it could also be subject to the criticism.
Hard to tell with a written forum post.