> The only thing worse than a bad union is no union.
Could you expand on why you believe unions can never be net negative?
Could you expand on why you believe unions can never be net negative?
But to a lot of people who oppose them, it's a more convincing statement that they're a balancing force for good than anything else I've come up with.
I usually say, "The only thing worse than a union is no union." because I'm aware that they can have negative effects. Police unions come to mind. I still wouldn't ban them though. Police unions should really be an example of how powerful they can be for the working class, if nothing else.