Rather than all the useless ineffectual discussions that happens whilst a minority at Stanford continues to impose their views on the majority, what can be done to push back in a way that actually changes things?
The problem we have today is that people will look at disdain for one flavor of authoritarianism as an argument to impose a competing flavor of authoritarianism. Those with an authoritarian tendency exploit this dynamic actively such that societies are constantly oscillating between the different authoritarian policies, accumulating more liberty reducing rules with each swing of the pendulum.