Or you could, you know, start with the excess mortality rate as measured by actuaries and then find out how many are clots and sudden deaths.

The problem is they’re using phrases like “brain 500 errors” and expecting people to take anything they say seriously.

At the same time, there’s more than enough signal that we’ve done an intentionally terrible job looking into adverse effects, intentionally so because if the data isn’t there, it’s hard to demonstrate liability. On top of that there have been numerous examples of anyone trying to apply the null hypothesis being intentionally smeared or discredited because applying the null hypothesis was essentially against public policy for the vaccines. The way things have been handled have been less than honest. I know several people who have had issues after taking the vaccine. My father died like 2 months after his second Pfizer vaccine shot and at the time we didn’t do an autopsy because he had a bad ticker and it didn’t seem necessary. In the time since, I’ve learned enough to regret not requesting an autopsy to check if side effects from the vaccine had not been a contributing factor to him passing away sooner.

I would be very wary for correlation without actual cause. Can you disregard stress for instance? You think there is cause but that does not mean there is any.