This is because your comment is bog standard disinformation. It tickles the groupthink narrative about "lockdowns", even though "lockdowns" did not exist in the US beyond a few counties in California.
If you could legally leave your home (ie you were not subject to a stay at home order with the force of law), you were not "locked down".
"Lockdown" evokes an idea of being uniformly unable to go out at all, which was most certainly not the case. Rather, the business and institutions that were closed were closed for specific reasons. For each venue we can debate those specific reasons - some were certainly ridiculously overbearing [0] - but grouping it all into "lockdowns" accomplishes nothing besides encouraging people talk past one another.
[0] Non-controversial example: open air parks that were closed.
It's like claiming you were a prisoner of war because the theme park was closed for maintenance when you wanted to go.