Hacker News Reader

Comment by MakisH | Hacker News Reader

In a C++ course we teach at the Technical University of Munich (for students coming from a non-CS background), this is pretty much the direction we have recently steered the curriculum. It is amazing how we were always expected to "just figure out" all these very important practical aspects by ourselves as students, while these are so complicated for C++. In combination with a lot of outdated material out there, students end up feeling lost and giving up, or going through a lot of pain to develop even simple projects.

View on HN

> It is amazing how we were always expected to "just figure out" all these very important practical aspects by ourselves as students, while these are so complicated for C++.

In france when I started engineering school (early 2010s) we had classes about:

- using the shell, emacs, being at least basically proficient unix tools

- using make, cmake, configuring compilers etc

wild that it isn't more common, this explains a lot!

I always thought the pain was the point. They wanted you to struggle to figure it out, it’s how you learned how to learn. If everything is spoon-fed you end up unable to solve your problems when they arise. You expect someone else to have solved the problem and you start looking for them instead of attempting to solve it yourself. Kinda like the main plot point of Enders game.

I understand your point, and I had to argue on it a lot when introducing such changes. I think the answer is struggling for the right task, but again with some guidance. If the learning outcome is to learn to program, then I don't see why you should waste half a semester trying to figure out by yourself the technicalities that could help you go beyond a hello world. Similarly, I don't believe we should (nowadays) force people to write everything in the terminal using Vim. The additional cognitive load is too distracting that it prevents you from digging deeper.

One can say "but that's how I learned, and I am fine and shine today". This is probably true, but then I believe that such a person had the right background to anyway learn by themselves. I see our mission as teachers to help the students that actually need the help, rather than letting them give up too early, in favor of some kind of excellence evolution. And I believe that if we prepare the right groundwork (explaining all the ropes before we start pulling them), then even the more advanced students will be able to learn even more that they would by themselves in a more struggling environment.

Self learning is part of the university experience. Researching without guidance is not.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com