I am surprised that none of the usual threats lists have picked these domains up.
I am surprised that none of the usual threats lists have picked these domains up.
Using those techniques, nobody would get a chance to see this second fall-back.
EDIT to clarify: Thanks for listing this, it's definately good to list these addresses as 'bad' for others to be aware, but DNS blocking won't slow down this malware, not even a bit.
Here's what it took for me to see cbpheback.com -- Install Pi-hole on the Android device and add these rules to iptables:
adb shell iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:53
adb shell iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:53
adb shell iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 5353 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:53
adb shell iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:53Yep, in a world of encrypted DNS transports, it is a folly to believe that DNS-based blocks would be affective at thwarting any sort of malware. That said, some IoC (indicators of compromise) setups do rely on it nevertheless.
you make it sound like people dumb for relying on something that works in certain situations. that's just hubris on your part if that's what you actually feel.
this is where I'm drawing my conclusion. no snake oil accusations necessary. the sentence is read with an implied "nevertheless, [dumbasses|idiots|noobies]" type of ending