I think the point is that all the people in the world and all the various information they have received leads them to believe that a laboratory studying this very virus was responsible for its release.
You chose to side with those that would blind themselves to any information that doesn't conform to a narrative
That is perfectly reasonable to me.
We don't have enough information and it's pretty bad a lot of professional public spokespeople are saying we are sure. That's the narrative.
But, why does public opinion even factor in this argument? Like many people here I have closely followed a lot of the information published. I certainly feel I am much more informed about this than my friends. But, my opinion on the source does not count for shit if professional scientists say they don't know. This guy is a professional.
But my comment also questions why she thinks it matters what the public believes.