If true information induces feelings in you, perhaps it's more constructive to reflect on the information rather than the motives of the reporter?
If true information induces feelings in you, perhaps it's more constructive to reflect on the information rather than the motives of the reporter?
Like the movie says: there is no conspiracy. Big brother is not watching you. It’s a headless blunder operating under the illusion of a master plan.
The Sun, positive: https://mobile.twitter.com/rainey_knight/status/161239752558...
The Mirror, positive: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-harry-confirms-...
The Sun, negative: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/21085974/piers-morgan-harry-ta...
The Mirror, negative: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/army-fury-prince-harry-...
The size of the advertising industry suggests otherwise.
A simple phrasing like this does not reflect the reality of humanities evolution and resulting biology. We're social creatures, requiring that others make us feel things: https://www.apa.org/monitor/oct05/mirror
Unless you're a psychopath, perhaps: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/321839
This in 2023, when people feel offended by anything, sounds pretty off...