Hacker News Reader

Comment by Zircom | Hacker News Reader

As most weird things along those lines in America, I can almost guarantee it's some sort of liability policy. They don't wanna be held responsible if a civilian gets themselves hurt/lost/killed trying to rescue someone, or does the same to the person they're trying to rescue, having being asked to or "ordered" by someone in a perceived position of authority like a coast guard officer.

View on HN

It makes a lot of sense to me in this case. As you suggest, even a "if you don't mind" from the Coast Guard could very reasonably be taken as a polite order which they may not have the authority to do in this case.

>They don't wanna be held responsible if a civilian gets themselves hurt/lost/killed trying to rescue someone,

That seems like a not unreasonable concern even if there was probably no material danger in this case.

Don't you have some responsibilities in this case? If you see someone drowning with no one else but you, you are expected to theow at least a life vest

I don't see much difference here, they have the gps data and are the closest people available. IMO it is their responsibility at that point. Imo the coast guard's "order" would be only a reminder of that responsibility?

That's not true. I don't know what happened in this incident, but the Coast Guard does have an official policy to request civilian assistance in some scenarios.

Section 4.1 Maritime SAR Assistance Policy (MSAP) http://uscgaux1201.org/documents/files/MSAP_2E.pdf

I was thinking it was comparable to CPR/first aid instructions from 911 calls however seafaring is inherently more risky...

Makes me wonder if, in this age of Covid, 911 operators would ask callers to perform CPR. Even a "Do you know how to perform CPR" might be interpreted as an instruction to do so.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com