Hacker News Reader

Comment by pclmulqdq | Hacker News Reader

You can't forget about ethnically Jewish people, another minority group that has disproportionately good outcomes. All of a sudden, these are just a new type of white people who (according to some notable activists like the BLM founders) have even more whiteness than the normal white people.

View on HN

> All of a sudden, these are just a new type of white people

Latin@s are going through this development right now. A growing number of them are choosing to identify as white and reject the whole framing of racial grievance mongering.

I’d just like to appreciate your use of “latin@“; I’ve never seen it before but it’s so much better than “LatinX”

Alternatively, you could just use normal Spanish

True, I should have specified that actual Spanish should be preferred over any bizarre artificial alternatives

"Latinx" is used because it avoids an unfortunate implication intrinsic to "Latino", "Latina", or "Latin@": the gender binary.

So does "Latin", but the point is to publicly signal virtue, hence the eye-catching and bizarre "x".

You can't forget about "womxn" and "folx." The insertion of an "x" seems to be more of an attempt to colonize/Lysenkoize the lexicon than to actually be inclusive.

Sticks in your craw, doesn't it, that x? Kinda like how trans, nonbinary, and genderqueer people do in our cisnormative society. It is deliberate, and it's intended to acknowledge the presence of something that was always there, but absent from our culture's understanding of the world.

It's about power and control.

He who controls language controls thought. He who controls thought wields absolute power.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com