> five inputs per conversation
That's hardly lobotomizing. 5 inputs is enough for most people. It also makes it significantly easier to for Microsoft to moderate a chain of 5 inputs versus unlimited ramblings that are very unpredictable.
That's hardly lobotomizing. 5 inputs is enough for most people. It also makes it significantly easier to for Microsoft to moderate a chain of 5 inputs versus unlimited ramblings that are very unpredictable.
In my case, I like to treat it as a research aid, as someone I can bounce ideas with; that usually leads to me having better ideas or unblocking myself.
I hardly ever use it to search for factual or straightforward responses, as I am competent enough with Google that I can confidently find content about a topic on the Internet if it exists. In these cases, going through a conversational agent is disruptive to my process.