Hacker News Reader

Defaults are good. Let them take a bath. Writing down the loss is the only practical way to get the asking rents down. Asking rents in SF are up 55% in real dollars over the past 20 years, but vacancy stands at an all-time high as well. It doesn't make any sense and some process is needed to destabilize this equilibrium.

View on HN

> get the asking rents down

I know it eventually happens, but it seems like a lot of commercial landlords would rather have excessive vacancies than lower the rent to attract new tenants or keep existing tenants. Is there some kind of tax reason for it?

It's not tax reasons. It is because they can pretend the building is worth X as long as they have tenants paying that rate and regardless of the vacancies, but as soon as they lease out at X`<<X they have to mark the value of the building down which upsets all of their financing. They are, in a loose sense, Wile E. Coyote just before he looks down.

Often they are highly leveraged and funded with no recourse debt. If they can't pay the mortgage without low vacancy at high rents, there's no point to lowering rents. Low vacancy and low rents still ends up with the landlord losing their entire investment and the bank owning the building.

Indeed, sf has so many vacant and closing stores but the landlords are still raising rents. It’s strangling the city.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com