Your entire comment is incoherent.
>netflix delivers data to you
You have to stick with one story, you can't change your mind and expect people to not call you out.
>are you saying the delivery man should only buy his car (AWS) and never help maintain the road (infrastructure)?
If netflix runs their own delivery then they already pay for most of the costs including public infrastructure. There is no problem and no reason to pay extra for no additional service being rendered.
>why should the customer who order food has to pay for the road the delivery person will use? the customer already paid for the service!
I don't know in what universe you live but most companies that deliver products charge an extra delivery fee. In the case of the internet, the fee structure is split up so that data centers pay for delivery to a hub node and ISP customers pay for delivery from that hub node to their home. The delivery fee is merely split into two parts, absolutely nothing complicated. The delivery fee of the company is transparently included in their pricing and this means the entire delivery including infrastructure costs is already paid for. Your analogy regarding ISPs being the road makes no sense. ISPs are another delivery company, not a road company as most countries do not legislate that the infrastructure and service have to be separated into multiple companies.
>billions $ are circulating in the market, and our core infrastructures always has to suffer
What does that have to do with anything? High speed internet infrastructure is very cheap, you just need to build it but there is zero incentive to build out infrastructure if you can just charge more money without delivering a faster and higher quality service.
We could have had high speed internet in every country if ISPs weren't incentivized to get subsidies for their copper networks and milk those cash cows dry until they get even more subsidies for the fiber roll out even though they have plenty of money.