[flagged]
[only] "one side had slaves states"
"one side had slaves states" [and the other didn't].
[there was the side with slave states] "and the other side was the confederacy"
All of these are wrong but all are implied by the most common, good-faith parse of that sentence. Indeed using a strict parse of that sentence and De Morgan's theorem for inference it is outright wrong.
(Not buying into the "the civil war was not about slavery" argument. It was: https://www.tyseidule.com/excerpt.html)
No. It implies the opposite. The assumption was that only the confederates had slave states. My comment debunks that notion.
Everybody knows that the confederacy had slaves. Now they know both sides had slave states.
Nice try.